Today was the capper. After having eaten WAY too many dark chocolate M&M's for a second day in a row, and having my body react with the shakes and be repulsed by a lovely dinner prepared by my mother, my awareness of the way I deal with anxiety sharpened.
Anxious moments are most often dealt with trying to "self-medicate' with a run to the fridge, stuffing my face with food, "treating myself" to something to eat. It is the very act of eating, of filling my mouth till it is full that gives me some temporary sense of "control", which quickly vanishes once I have swallowed. For even when I am full, I still have to deal with that which makes me anxious.
There have been times that, even when I am sick to death of eating and am VERY full, I have continued eating to try and douse the burgeoning anxiety. Instead of directly dealing with the anxiety - "looking under the hood", as it were - and find out what exactly is giving me such a tough time, I will shy away. I often don't believe that I have it within myself to right the problem, or that the answer is not imediately appartent and I don't want to have to "do the work" of trying to find a solution; thereby making myself even more anxious, and stuffing myself even more in an effort to "shut out the anxiety".
It has been the source of terrible probelsm with weight. The last 4 months of 2006 six saqw me lose a great deal of weight, only to have me gain back at least 9-10 pounds of it again. Rather then seek a solution to my boredom with exercise, I simply choose not to do it. Feeling anxious over not exerciseing, I go back to eating. I "placate" myself by eating things that are "healthy:, but in such quantity that it is no longer healthy. For when I stop eating, I am then almost IMMEDIATELY faced with my fears again - fears of inadequacy about my job, fears about (and in trying to name this fear - I just reached for a bottle of water in order to "chug" something.....wow - it's really someting that I allow to control me).
I have a fear about my realtionship with DW- something in the back of my mind. His having come here from New Orleans to start his life over, having just left 6 months ago a very poisonious relationship that lasted 14 years with someone who was terribly addicted to alcohol and drugs. Given all that he has been through, I admire him greatly for having the courage to leave what has been his home to come here and start again.
My fear, and it's not a constant fear, but one that pops up in my mind sometimes, is that we may have gotten involved to quickly; that perhaps I should have allowed him more time to date others. We settled on each other in what seems like such a short amount of time. We3 talked about this, and he said he felt the same way at first, but that our relatoinship just "felt so right", that he just decided to go with it. Which is pretty much what I have done.
But he has been very limited by not having a car, by living with Deena at her house, by struggling with employment here. Hehad a job initially, only to leave that job because of the really horrible atompshere in that store. I don't blame him for leaving, for he was being taken advantage of, and for his own peace of mind he was right to leave.
I guess my fear is, what happens when he finally does get a job where he has something sound and life-giving, when he finally has transportation and can get around and see more of Maryland. What happens when he starts meeting other people, other guys....will I still be someone he wants in his life as a boyfriend? Will he still love me and want to be with me? Or will he meet someone else and want to be with them? (The question I ask is "Will he meet someone better than I am?" - but then that reveals that I've got this self-image issue, that if someone else wins his heart, that necessarily makes them better then I am - that somehow I would be less of a person, of lesser value because Doug chose to be with someone else. And I immediately want to reach out to myself and say that all of that is not true - that who I am, my integrity as a person deosn't change bcause of the choices another pesron maeks with regard to being in relatioship with me. My value, my worth is inherent - my being has worth because of my existance - not because of how I am treated or not treated by others. The lesson there is that sometimes we give too much power to another person to determine what our feelings of self-worth should be. If we could simply rest easy in the fact that our worth is something that is always with us, something that we don't have to worry about being "stolen" from us because of what others may or may not do - our anxiety level would go down.)
So the trick, is to stay with the feelings - to be infront of that "raw wound" of deflated self-worth and to look at it for what it really is. To be more merciful, more loving to myself. Then I find that the anxiety vanishes because it isn't any one person who really gives "worth" to me. "Worth" is not something that is given from the outside, but is a fundamental part of who and what we are. We need not be worried about our worth - we can simply know that it is always there. Letting go of the anxiety of our worth, of MY worth affords me the ability to see clearly.
And suddently - there is no need to fill myself with food - and for a moment I am resting comfortably within my own body. This moment can be here whenever, and is in fact a "natural" state of my body. I need not panic over the next moments of anixety, because that is simply the raw wound - or the illusion of a raw wound. If I "scratch" it, then I just irritate it more - but if I simply allow it to "bleed", it will heal on it's own - as Pema Chodron says.
It was reading Pema Chodron's meditation on additictions (
http://www.pemachodron.org/), that allowed me to meditate and write this. It was interesting when I got to the following paragraph that my body reacted in such a severe way that I felt COMPELLED to sit and confront the anxiety that was brewing inside: (in italics and centered for reference)
"The moment in which we give in to our addictions is a moment in which we are all caught up -in which there is tremendous karmic momentum to go forward in the same old way -to scratch the wound. This can be a wound which really bothers us -we can see the wound bleeding, we can see it getting worse and we will not stop scratching. We can actually even feel quite nauseated by what we are doing, but we just will not stop!
What allows us to stop is maitri, which in this case means a basic feeling that we do not have to be afraid of what we are feeling right now, that we do not have to look for alternatives, that we aren't ashamed of what we are feeling in this moment. We are scared of what we are feeling. Instead, we can just let our warmth toward the wound, or the warmth toward that instant of time just be there as the working basis.
Maitri is settling down with the situation without looking for alternatives.
Chogyam Trungpa Rinpoche talks about three stages in this process. The first is the warmth or maitri, the second is dropping discursive thinking and opening and the third is communicating. When we drop the discursive thinking and open, or communicate, what that basically means is that we we contact the moment fully.
At each moment of time, we can just completely cut discursiveness and open to the moment as an act of total freedom. We can cut through the solidity of identity, can cut through the solidity of our sense of identity, can cut through the solidity of our sense of problem and can just let the problem go. We can cut through the strong sense of "I need this now," "I have to get something out of this," we can cut through that.
But in order to do this we have to develop a sense that it is safe to stay with the present and not look for alternatives, that it is completely safe and even useful not to look for alternatives. Another way of looking at this is to say that we have a sense of warmth for the uncomfortable energy of the present moment, for the raw quality of energy, regardless of how irritating it is. And instead of being ashamed of being all caught up, we begin to regard it as a valuable place to be in. "
It was the anxiety I was feeling in that there would be no alternatives to my worrying about Doug leaving - and not stuffing food in my mouth - that caused such a severe reaction. It was thiking that what I was feeling now as going to be permanent and that I needed an IMMEDIATE alternative that makes me reach for food. I find that whenever I am in any situation that challenges me, I find myself saying "When I get through this, I am going to treat myself to something tasty", or if I am anxious at work or home, I immedaitely run to the kitchen and open the fridge.
And getting outragious and impossible promises from DW that "he'll never leave me" is, once again, looking outside myself for stablity and security that can NEVER come from the outside. My sense of "being home" with myself, my sense of security (indeed, can one ever be "secure" if, as the Buddha says, all things are temporary), can never come solely, or even principally, from outside of me.
Indeed, security - while something that helps one live life in a certain way - and provides a sense of comfort that is very desirable - is not a permanent state. Death will come and I will be gone, at least in from the state in which I exist now. Relationships will end (although I believe there is always something of our relationships that remains with us - even if in an inconscious way - we take with us all tha twe have encountered and all relationships that we have been in, no matter how fleeting - no matter if they have completely left our memory and awareness of them). The interdependent web of all beings and things, as our Unitarian-Unviersalist principles make us aware of, is inherent in all our encoutners - in our very "BE-ing". We odn't have to clutch onto relationships as if they were some possesion, for they were and are part of us, even prior to our knowledge of them. Their influence is permanent, even in the most minute quanitity - we are forever changed even by the slightest encounter. Therefor to cling to someone with all our might, is to invest needless energy.
So perhaps, no matter what becomes of Doug and I, he was already part of me before I even knew him, and will continue to be long after both of us are gone. Should we be so fortunate as to share in each other's life from this point onward, I would consider that a unique blessing. But should we part, I cannot allow our parting to degrade what I thinik about myself.
So there is no need to for the food . And I can simply rest in myself. I don't need to seek out the solace of anything in particular - because all I have lies within me now. NOt in this radical self-sufficiency in which I don't need anyone or anything...but rather in the realiziation that there is this deep down connectedness - far beyond our abilitiy to express in words, actions, emotions, but that we are nevertheless drawn towards and called to act upon, to try and make manifest in our lives through our daily work, our mediations, our loving, our becoming who we truly are.
And it seems that I have lived myself into the pace that I was so despeartely looking for when I was reaching for those M&M's today. I just need to realize that what I am grasping for, is already here.
Namaste.